Justice as lived experience (WP5)

This subproject aims at highlighting tensions in European ideals of justice and fairness from the perspective of groups who experience or are vulnerable to injustice. By accounting for the contextualised ‘lived experiences’ of (in)justice, the study brings to the fore non-hegemonic claims to justice expressed by disadvantaged groups and individuals. It rests on an assumption that the ‘lived experience’ of injustice is by no means homogeneous – how vulnerable categories experience injustice (e.g. as misrecognition of as maldistribution) may differ not only per sphere of justice (economic, social, political and civil/symbolic), but also per category of the vulnerable.  After all, each of the countries involved in ETHOS has developed its own model to balance and incorporate interests of various groups of the population (the young, the old, women, ethnic and religious minorities, recent migrants and asylum seekers) and to define and deal with the ‘insiders-outsider’ divide. While the study takes the perspective of the vulnerable, it avoids a focus on victimhood, emphasising agency. The project promotes debate and discussion among those experiencing injustice and the broader public, about the challenges and opportunities that their experiences pose for Europe.

Leading partner: UoB/UU; leading researchers: ­Bridget Anderson/Trudie Knijn

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme under grant agreement No. 727112


REPORT: Conceptualisation and articulation of justice: Justice in social theory

This deliverable outlines the conceptualization and articulation of justice in social theory. This deliverable will principally focus on sociological and anthropological theories that relate in one way or the other to philosophical reflections on justice and fairness. At the beginning of these disciplines’ developments, their founders were deeply interested in justice related issues, reflecting on legal, economic, social and interpersonal aspects of (in)justice and offering macro- and micro-level interpretations of causes and outcomes of (in)justice and (un) fairness.